Friday, May 23, 2008

Suck it up

The average price of gasoline in Bellingham has just hit $4.00 per gallon with diesel hovering a little below $5.00 a gallon.

The phenomena of rising oil prices has produced a strange effect throughout the town; if you open a window and lean your right ear towards the sky you can actually hear it: like a mosquito buzzing above your head while you sleep, but this is no mosquito its the collective whining of an oil addicted populace.

I have no sympathy what-so-ever. This new reality is exactly the answer this stupid culture has been unwittingly asking for over the past 100 years. When you eagerly shove all your eggs into one basket, a basket with a dwindling half-life, a basket owned by enourmous corporate entities with green in their hearts and grubby thick hands this is what you reap. So its time to suck it up people, you asked for it. Indefinitely cheap oil was always a pipe dream; and the automobile the great unchallenged premise of our age. Think its bad now? Wait till it gets really expensive.

To continue the analogy, I've come to liken the whining drivers to an abused wife who keeps taking her husband back even though he just turns around and smacks her the next day. "Oh, but it'll be better this time, I know he really loves me..." SMACK!

So gas up the SUVs and Ford 350s, its Memorial Day weekend and we Americans are God's people and doing whatever we want whenever we want is our birthright. Drive away!

Labels: , ,

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Experiments in Anonymity

Project Bellingham.  

Sometime in the fall of 2006 a coin was flipped.  As it spun through the air each side represented a potential destination and life: fortune was tossed to the wind so to speak.  No good reasons were pulling the coin tosser towards either Bellingham, WA or Bend, OR so why not wing it?

What I didn't realize was that a causal series of events was being put into place that would leave my realm of control and spiral out into the world at large, pass the event horizon of potentiality where it becomes impossible to discern direct causation from indirect.

Project Bellingham has been something of a social petri glass for the doings and happenings between my thick skull; a chance to start again with blank slate.  Its been interesting so far.  I foresee more experiments in the future.


Labels:

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Darwin's Dangerous Idea

A few years ago PBS produced a movie based on the Darwin's famous trip to the Galapagos Islands during which he observed the finches and their specifically adapted beaks and his subsequent scientific realizations. The movie is interspersed with commentary by the philosopher Daniel Dennet who wrote a book by the same name and who offers us, the viewers, an overview and context of what is going on.

I think the movie does a good job of illustrating not just the religious opposition Darwin faced, but the scientific theories of the time. 'Formalism', explanations largely based on Platonic metaphysics (i.e.: that specieization is derivative from prime 'forms' just like Plato thought our ideas were) dominated the rationalist thinking of the time. It is really incredible to consider the staunch opposition Darwin faced from both sides.

Had Darwin been born a generation earlier he most likely would have been tortured and forced to recant under threat of death, and upon so doing would have been slowly and cruelly murdered, probably by slow burning or quartering. All in the name of Christianity of course.

Descent with modification from a common ancestor... the idea is really so simple, yet so revolutionary, and so obvious when one takes a cursory look at the world. I can't help but wonder how far our species might have advanced by now if we hadn't suffered the oppression of authority, dogmatism, and imaginary fear for so many sad centuries.

Labels: ,

Saturday, May 10, 2008

The worst is over, or so they say!

I made it through the first trimester, without too many bumps and bruises! Actually those are the last thing I was going to get with all the sleeping and sitting around I was doing. Once you work an 8hr day with 45 preschoolers the only activity you can fathom is taking a shower, and sometimes that is pushing it! All that fatigue and the nausea seems to be wearing off now that I am entering the second trimester this week. I am hoping that, along with our move to Bellingham, with be enough motivation to get me back on the bike to explore some smooth single track and the greenways around Bellingham. I am starting to show a bit more now, despite having only gained a pound or two in these three months, and sadly putting away another pair of shorts or pants every week. If only Nate weren't so skinny, I might be able to wear some of his shorts. Oh well, I guess I can't complain. We are thankful that we haven't had any complications and the baby appears to be healthy and growing, or my belly is at least! More later, and hopefully more bike related in the future.

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Social Structures and Practices of the Kulani Friday Riders

Kulani Forest is both friend and foe to any who would rider her trails. Offering as many conditions and opportunities days in the year, no ride is the same. I intend to offer a reflexive analysis of the unique, kindred and often amusing collection of people who gather each week to pay homage to the wonderful experience that the trails offer. The riders themselves are as diverse as their two-wheeled steeds, each sharing in their love for the ride. My intent is to show that while the riders are diverse in their nature and consequently, their beliefs, their weekly gathering allows them to share a coherent lore, waiting to be understood.

Infiltration of the Long Hairs
From the outset, the riders struck me an amorphous group, with little as far as structured beliefs and ideas. Each person had their own unknown history, and was waiting to be uncovered and interpreted. Without much knowledge of the history of the riders as a whole unit, it really was hard to see the fine lines that separate them out into smaller units, each unit with different ideas about the world. At their core, all of them enjoy the ride, the race and the brew afterward (one exception on the brew). My informant allowed a closer glimpse of the history of the ride, the close ties between some, and the newer, more fragile relationships between the original riders and the “long hairs.” I asked my informant to explain the factions within the group. The “long hairs” had “infiltrated” the Friday ride six years prior to my arrival. They remained nameless, though with a little observation it was easy to distinguish them from the rest of the riders. The “long hairs” as my informant described them, were not all long of hair. It was a jest about their more liberal stances of political debate. This is a relative observation because no one would rightly call them “hippies,” though that was clearly what my informant was insinuating. While discussion in the liberal circle around a grill of charring steaks generally evolved toward environmental concerns, evoking routine discussion of high oil prices, Mesopotamian wars and food shortages around the world, every last one of these riders drives a large truck or SUV to the weekly ride. One would reasonably expect that this group would often differ in ideals.

A clash of titanic idealism came forth from within both parties as they discussed the relationship between food shortages and overpopulation in a post-ride, alcohol-fueled debate. Our longhaired friends were determined that the food shortage stemmed from our government’s recent subsidies for corn ethanol fuel, while the, I guess you could call them short hairs, to be fair, pondered how a food shortage could allow the world’s population to continue its growth. One of the women, originally from Canada, chimed in that poorer populations, where there is less food, tend procreate more often, as their children have higher rates of mortality. The belligerent questioning continued more loudly as they ignored her response. How can the worlds population grow if there is a food shortage?! No one seems offended by this display, nor does anyone attempt to stop it. Each has probably learned in their own way through the years that evidence matters little to a man in a drunken stupor. Long before, just after the ride, those who would have cared for rationality had already left.

A professor of Horticulture at the University of Hawaii, Hilo, Dr. Tanabe has been with this group from the early 1990’s and has secured a position of respect from the riders. As mentioned previously, he cares deeply for his training and physical needs and therefore does not drink alcohol at the end of each ride with the rest of the group. Not only does he abstain from drinking, but he is often the first to leave the quarry, mere minutes after finishing the ride. I can see how a man with a great deal of education could allow himself to slip free from this group before they get started each Friday night. I can imagine that it possibly serves to preserve his respect for his fellow riders.

Moral Disparagement
Another moral issue and later discussion arose one evening after the discovery of a vehicle stashed in the woods. It was just after clearing the newest addition to the trail before the ride that Chris and I happened upon a man waiting next to a Jeep and a Dodge, the Dodge, parked in the woods with all the doors open and nothing inside. My first reaction was that it was stolen and subsequently stashed, not expecting twenty odd riders to happen upon it. Really, there is no way to know if the man next to it had done the deed, but each person had different reactions when faced with the man’s response and intentions. The man’s story was that he was hunting pig and happened upon the truck, maybe true, maybe not, at this point it did not matter. His next statement was that he was claiming it for his own, he had found it and we had no claim to it, so he was going to haul it home. At this point, I left, skeptical of his claims and in my mind, he clearly lacked my same ethical values. One of the riders I was with as we happened upon the man stayed with him to talk some more, and perhaps he received a more convincing argument than I, but subsequent discussion revealed that he believed the man and that the man had every right to his finder’s keepers moral. The ride started and discussion ensued en route as those who had not seen the trucks were quickly updated. After the finish, discussion of the trucks and man resumed to reveal three distinct ideas about the situation. One group believed the man’s story that he found the truck and that he was justified in taking it, another group believed the man, but did not feel that he should take it, and a third group including myself believed that the man was outright lying and intended to steal the truck and had knowledge of its location before. In the end, a Friday rider notified the police who arrested the man immediately, later revealing that both vehicles were stolen. The debate over the truck exposed one thing very clearly, that political stances do not delineate moral values within this group. Each group had its own detractor of others within that usually fall upon the same side. The interworking of the moral debate is far more complex than can be analyzed by this paper to be sure.

Meta Ethnography
I tended to be either unresponsive or evasive when questioned about my political stances. In reflection, this was probably a good idea as some, particularly my main informant, would have realized they have less in common with me than previously thought and may not have as straightforward and forthcoming in the future. With a group of twenty plus riders too, it would have been difficult to interview each one to gain such information, as one on one contact may too have been a little uncomfortable, especially when faced with the notion that their words may have impact beyond their group. Consequently, I was content to stand back from it all and take in the group from a general sense, until a specific conversation would pique my interest, at which point I would wander over to listen more closely to the debate.

Even in the beginning, because I was previously involved in the biking community and knew many of the riders, I let them know that my prime interest in joining their ride was to complete a study of their group for an ethnography class. Many in the group were interested in my paper and expressed the desire to read my work after I was finished. I found this surprising but also interesting as they queried the issues that I have covered, the title and main points that I had discussed thus far. Admittedly, I had done little more than a very broad, but long description of the rituals that take place each Friday. I found their questioning helpful too as they helped me realized new topics for discussion that I had missed in my surface observations. Their curiosity and interest as to how they were being portrayed showed more enthusiasm for my project than I had originally thought. At the beginning, I believed them to have thought that I was joking about my project as I had chosen a topic that seemed far from academia. Admittedly, it had seemed a bit of a joke, as I continued each week to ride a pace that allowed me no less than a fourth place finish, all the while claiming to do so in the name of anthropology.

Unsafe at Any Speed
While in the political realm the riders seem quite divided in their respective views, they all share in common rules for engaging in the Friday ride. New riders are always welcome provided they maintain safe bicycles that are designed for such rigorous terrain and wear appropriate physical protection. The helmet is an obvious concern, as brain injuries are no joking matter, but the bicycle itself needs a little more explaining. An unsafe bicycle, usually purchased very cheap, and several brands are, constitutes a health risk equal to that of a helmetless head. The riders are expected to maintain a proper trail bike designed for use in the trail. Spotting a bicycle that is not designed for use in the forest is easy and would constitute an immediate lecture of the associated health risks by any of the riders. Safety is taken very seriously and there are not exceptions with this group.

She’s a Fickle Bitch
The forest itself, while it is almost revered by its weekly entourage, is also a fickle bitch. The Kulani trail system has worked its way into the rider folk lore as one of the nastiest and most technical singletrack trail that bikes can ride. And for that it is to be both feared and respected. While most of the riders would claim not to be superstitious, they believe, and as I have seen, the moment you think you are on top of your game, have the trail figured out, vanquished your devils and have a sure line to victory for the day, the trail is sure to even the odds, whether through and ill placed stick or a bone jarring fall. Most of the sticks, however, are not blamed upon the trail in her grand scheme to even the score, but on Chris, owner of the bike shop, fixer of their parts. They joke, as does he, that he has a financial incentive to toss out these spoke killers and derailleur destroyers onto the trail as he rides, to be unleashed upon the unfortunate riders behind. When asked who places the sticks on the trail, it is indubitable that the response would be immediate and precise – “Chris.”

Care for a Smoke?
The fun ride sentiment stems from the early years of riding when it was more common to come to the ride at four, pick a trail and destination ride as a group to get there and finally, smoke a joint before heading back to the start. When Chris created the Rooty Connector and Hilo Bike Hub way to close in the loop in 2002, the fun ride quickly became more competitive than before. Many of the riders wish to return to the glory days of casual riding with friends, though there are as many that are satisfied with the current state of affairs. “Fun Ride” is a name thrown around quite loosely as a joke, because most of the riders are there to compete on a weekly basis. This is why many of the riders do want younger, faster riders to join the group, and are disappointed when they leave. The competitive edge is softened by the post ride drinks offered by any other casual affair. The food, drink and atmosphere could as easily be mistaken for a weekend party, as the talk quickly leaves the subject of cycling soon after the stories of falls, broken bits and near misses are divulged among the group. Newcomers are offered a beer from a six-pack, a cup of Mehana Porter from the mini keg or a joint as readily as any other longtime racer that forgot his.

The Menehunes did it
There is a running joke about the trail maintenance, which ties this group with a little Hawaiian folklore. The riders will outright deny working on the trails to improve or maintain them, as technically they are county property. To anyone not already knowledgeable of their work, the Menehunes did it. The Menehunes of Hawai’i are known for their building of stone walls at night; the Menehunes of the Kulani forest, having fewer stones to work with, have set about to build and maintain trails. The riders are only so lucky that the Menehunes have chainsaws at their disposal to clean up after windstorms. While the riders have an ongoing understanding with the county for their weekly use of the trail, they do enjoy pulling the wool over the eyes of anyone who would ask.

Reflexivity
Of the group that assembles each Friday, I am the only rider that uses my bike out of necessity. For the rest of them, cycling, while it may hold reasonable significance for them, is merely a tool for pleasure, which they enjoy each week, for some as a form of exercise, others stress relief, and still others, to enjoy friends. The utilitarian use of the bicycle gets lost as inconvenient truths nagging at the back of their minds. Perhaps it is because they are getting older. Many of them in the past ridden have routinely to the Friday ride on their trusty steed and home again. It is easy for me to neglect myself and pass judgment on them as I hear their complaints about the price of gasoline, while they ride for leisure the very tool by which they could alleviate some of their concerns. Chris has recently begun riding his bike again to class to help offset some of the costs of driving into town each day. Passing judgment, as I have done before, is neglecting the unique positions that every one of these people finds themselves in each day. Living within close proximity to everything one needs, without being financially able to afford gasoline, let alone cars causes one to forget the reasons why an ethnographer does ethnography. Still, I admittedly found the complaints about oil prices disgusting when paired with this notion.

Towering Inferno
Towering fires decorate the walls behind Chris’ desk. Several of the riders enjoy construction occupations which allow them both the freedom of a 4:00 ride and free scrap wood and palates. The riders do enjoy a good fire. The stacks of lumber come by the truckload when a fire is to be had. Precariously arranged pyres looming high into the blackened sky ignite only as a well fueled gasoline fire should. I wonder if this is safe. The circled faces slowly back away from the intensity of the flame. Even the sleeping dog has stirred to avoid the unstable flaming platform. The faces all continue to stare. Something so beautiful cannot be ignored. With an unsettling groan, the pyre shifts on its depleted pedestal, and with a final, stubborn snarl the tower crumbles to the ground sending of a final wave of scalding heat as the coals burn from an angry orange to a dull red.

My place among the riders has come to an end. My friendship with them was genuine, which I believe has allowed me construct a reasonable portrayal of both their love of cycling and their memorable antics. Of fired pyres and chainsaw wielding Menehunes I will one day dream. I will treasure the memories gained from this unique opportunity for years to come, and one day, perhaps, join them again in the Kulani Forest.

Sunday, May 4, 2008

Informed Skepticism is best

Hitchens vs. Hitchens

The above is a very long debate between Christopher Hitchens and Peter Hitchens which outlines a few of the issues of both the Iraq war and the notion of god. Tension drips with every exchange and, while Peter says nothing new in the debate against the war, Christopher makes some very interesting points, though, like Doe, I cannot help but to be skeptical of both the pro war front that claims that the ends justify the means. Taking a political despot from power is reason enough for being there. The anti war campaign would leave such a man in power, allowing him to continue killing Kurds. I suppose you could tally the amount of civilians killed by us against the number of Kurds and civilians Hussein is believed to have killed during a five year average to see at what margin we are justified to be there, but that would be a pretty lame excuse.

At any rate, the US is in Iraq, there is no question there. We have taken Hussein from power, for better or for worse, and, if the Iraqis ever appreciated us being there, we are unquestioningly staying beyond our welcome, though leaving may or may not incite more violence.

George Bush would have us believe that he knows more about what is going on than we do, and many war advocates cite this as reasons not to doubt the need for our presence in the region. Whether or not this is true, it is clear that he will not be the one that continues to make decisions, thankfully. A man so dogmatic and unwavering regardless of the will of the people is tiresome to the rest of us.

So what should this lead us to believe about the Iraq war? The need to continue to be skeptical. For most of us, all we receive is propaganda from both fronts, some of it is absurd and some of it is plausible. We can really only hope that the next administration is transparent, informing us of the reasons for decisions through dialogue. And while the primaries are nearly over, we still have choices we need to make to decide what form of leadership we want for the next four years.

Labels: , ,

Saturday, May 3, 2008

What to think of the war

I haven't written much about the Iraq war since its beginnings some 5 years ago. Usually my personal journals bear out whatever is happening in the world; writing is my own way of thinking things through, I find that identifying questions I have and putting them into words is a crucial step in creating coherent arguments later down the line.

But this war, this damn war continues to elude me.  I've not experienced a social issue in my lifetime that I've had such a hard time finding an opinion for; nothing has proven this difficult.  I've been skeptical at times, but never virulently leftist.  I've entertained the neo-con's PNAC arguments finding some worth in them, but I simply don't know enough.  I doubt Fukuyama's utopian-laced conclusion that we've reached an end of ideological history (a strong pillar of argument for the war); though I find some of his dialectical arguments persuasive.  Maybe my Straussian political science teacher was right, the more I come to doubt democratic virtue the more I think there might be something to that line of thought.

If I know one thing in this mess its that many of the leftists arguments against 'American imperialism' are full of shit.  The up-turned nose, bourgeois ignorance that the Iraqi people had a good thing going under Saddam is sickening.  Its hard to believe that the same crown who supposedly has championed human rights causes for the last 50 years could reject the liberation of Iraq's government and populace on the grounds that the people in that troubled country prefer 'strong men' with dictatorial strains.  Perhaps they forget that their leader was the same man who committed genocide against the Kurds and slaughtered any sign of dissidence in his own country.  

If any group should have been in support of the Iraq war it should have been the left; the liberation of oppressed people is nothing if not a liberal belief.  Isolationism is an inherently conservative position; people seem to readily forget this fact when arguing about America's initial intervention in Iraq.  

I believe there is a correct way to think about international conflicts; though I don't have many answers just yet.  In the search for logical coherence there are some very crucial points which must be confronted:

Religion: This insurgency is being championed by men who really believe the fairy tales their holy books and leaders proclaim.  Their Islamic values are in inherent contradiction with the secularism of the west: this is an impass that demands a logical position.    The masochistic liberals would have us believe that the insurgency is purely reactionary; that it exists only because of an American occupation of their holy lands.  Bullshit.  We do ourselves a dangerous disservice if we doubt what these extremists are clearly telling us.

Bush: The foibles and failures of this president have been clear from the start of the war; he was unclear about our intentions and goals in Iraq; rejected the council of experienced generals, and has let his narcissism cloud the better course of action many times.  But to say that the war is ill-founded simply because our leader is an idiot is too easy, too simple minded, and really doesn't help us find actual answers.

Maybe its the increasing urgency of the issue, or the childish arguments for and against the war, but I feel the need to flesh out this concern sooner rather than later.  Come the end of the year we are going to have a fresh new moron ruling the country and things will be changing, so now is as good a time as ever to start getting contrarian.


Labels: , ,